Risk Sharing Platform
In today’s aid ecosystem, resilience requires more than risk awareness—it demands equitable risk sharing. I work with donors, NGOs, ministries, and consortiums to move beyond token partnership toward structured systems that distribute risks fairly and transparently.
From facilitating tough dialogues between ministries and their CSO partners to supporting consortiums in mapping and balancing delivery chain risks, I help organizations embed risk sharing into both their operations and governance frameworks.
This includes reviewing and aligning policies to ensure they don’t merely push risks downstream, but instead enable mutual responsibility, timely action, and trust-building—especially in fragile contexts where imbalance can undermine outcomes.
What the platform enables in practice:
– One shared risk register for the entire consortium
– Clear assignment of mitigation actions to specific organizations
– Live dashboards and heatmaps for threats and opportunities
– A running record of progress, not just meeting minutes
🎯 Explore the Platform:
See how it works in real time at RiskSharingPlatform.com
🎥 Watch Tutorials:
Follow the step-by-step video playlist to explore all features — from adding partners to reviewing shared dashboards.
Watch on YouTube
Insights from Mohanna’s Journey: Risk sharing only works when responsibility is matched with support. I’ve seen too many situations where local partners are told “manage this risk” without any resources or political cover. By making responsibilities explicit — who is taking which action, by when, with what backing — the platform helps partners move from pressure to partnership. It turns “you handle it” into “we’ll do this together, and here’s how.”
Navigating Risk Sharing in Practice
The platform transforms risk management from a reporting task into a shared process. Instead of each partner keeping separate spreadsheets, all actors work from one shared register — identifying, discussing, and tracking risks together. This transparency builds mutual accountability and reduces delays caused by fragmented communication.
By agreeing early on which partner is best placed to manage each type of risk — technical, operational, financial, or reputational. The platform formalizes these agreements, showing who acts, who supports, and how progress is tracked. Fairness comes not from splitting risks equally, but from aligning them with each partner’s capacity.
It’s not about assigning blame when risks materialize — it’s about joint action. Partners comment, update, and reassign mitigation tasks in real time. Every action is logged, so trust grows through transparency, not promises. This structure turns conversations into commitments and commitments into measurable results.
Local actors gain visibility and voice in risk discussions that were once limited to lead agencies. Over time, the data collected from shared risks becomes an evidence base for better decision-making and adaptive learning. This helps shift localization from theory to practice — building confidence, capacity, and collective resilience.
Click the button below to fill out the form and subscribe to Mohanna.io's newsletter.
Fill the Subscription Form